How did the psychology club help me? Reviews!

How did the psychology club help me? Reviews!

What can the Freud's Legacy psychology club do for you? We work as a team – specialists in counselling and in medicine, representing different schools and different personality types – offering people comprehensive, affordable and effective psychosocial counselling. And it matters that we hold an Austrian trade licence for life and social counselling, which is already a mark of quality. This article gathers a few reviews from our residents: how the psychology club helped them in their lives. Perhaps there is something here for you too.

freud--images_articles_kak-psikhologicheskij-klub-pomogaet-lyudyam_b2ap3_small_ebner-otsiv-profiling.webp

Dima, thank you so much for the "Profiling" course and for this precious knowledge. Once I found out my personality type, life became so clear and simple. I accepted myself even more, I learned about my particular features, about my weak and my strong sides. The course was very interesting and very useful for me. I also met some very interesting people, for which I am also very grateful. It was the right decision. Thank you!

freud--images_articles_kak-psikhologicheskij-klub-pomogaet-lyudyam_b2ap3_small_otsiv-o-kurse-profiliga.webp

I want to thank Dimitri Korenev once again for the wonderfully run profiling course that has just finished. And to tell you about the practical use of the profiling skills I picked up.

The setting: a compulsory visit to the doctor with the baby, which the insurance is supposed to cover. But the insurer loses the papers twice, the newborn ends up uninsured, and we have to pay ourselves at the private rate. We send the papers in for reimbursement and get only half of it back. The insurer suggests recovering the rest from the doctor — maybe it will work.

The solution:

I write a letter setting out the facts and my request to the insurer's ombudsman. In parallel I go and talk to the doctor.

From a year and a half of dealing with her, I know that the doctor belongs to the frustrating type with an active life position — Fru-active for short. So in the conversation I lean less on facts and more on justice. By her personality type that matters more to her. It works: the doctor explodes and swears she will show them what for, because these wretched penny-pinchers have driven her mad.

The ombudsman responds superbly to facts and details and promises to pass it on to those who are responsible for it all (which, along with other things, I read as a marker of the compulsive type)

Then the Ombudsman rings the Doctor and they have a spectacular conversation. Everything the Ombudsman, as a compulsive, does properly, with feeling, with sense and in due order, the Doctor does at lightning speed, at a rush and just so as not to get stuck. By the S-Theory they are each other's Shadows, and with 99% probability they irritate each other from the very first words. So the Doctor has no idea at all what the Ombudsman is asking for, and batters him with a torrent of words and a shock wave (here I overdid the "justice"), while the Ombudsman has no idea at all what the doctor is telling him, since by definition he is not built for such speeds.

Interim result:

Last Friday the ombudsman rings me and apologises wildly that it is nothing to do with him (marker), that his instructions do not allow it (marker) and that he cannot pay out, because the doctor said that I had asked from the start to pay without insurance (that very failure of the two of them to hear each other), and then he spent ten minutes rationalising (marker) why I should not be so upset about it.

At that stage his compulsiveness was beyond doubt, so, just as we had talked it through last Wednesday in the final session of the module, I switched into the manic dynamic (because that is not merely something he will understand, it is something he will happily go along with): in simple sentences, alternating with the cheerful question "logical, isn't it?" (also a marker-lever), I explain the situation and offer to extract a letter from the doctor, since it did not come off verbally. The ombudsman could kiss me, because I have just pressed several levers of his personality type at once, and he agrees not to close the case and to wait.

That same Friday I write a letter to the doctor in which, alongside justice and the ombudsman's pedantry, I mention that we had agreed she would back me up. I ask for that written confirmation, but this time I batter her with facts, dates and logic.

I knew that the doctor, being Fru-active, would cut the whole thing short, because it is tiresome and dull for her and she has no time for it anyway. What I did not know was HOW she would cut it short. Given the levers and the triggers I had used, I hoped it would be in my favour.

The result:

I was right about the shortcut, but again I slightly miscalculated. The revolt of a Fru-active person in the name of justice can be a fearsome thing. I do not know what a commotion she stirred up at the insurer's and elsewhere, but today her staff paid me the full sum of 150 euros against a receipt (I had only asked for half), saying that they had settled everything with the insurer themselves and would recover it from them. And half an hour after the payment I got a call from a stammering Ombudsman, who said that what I now have in my account is a little too much, that I should not worry about it at all, because they will put it all right themselves at the next settlement.

Would you like to join us?

Do you have questions, situations or tasks that the psychology club could help you solve? Do you not know who to turn to, with so many self-styled "experts" all around, all of them promising something? Become a resident of the club for an affordable monthly membership fee. We meet every day, sometimes several times a day. The psychology club works online, wherever you live. You can take a look at us, see what it is like and... leave, if it does not suit you. Or stay, and get effects similar to those of the other residents.